On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 7:52 PM Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 07:41:54PM +1300, Barry Song wrote: > > > > probably no, as an incompressible page might become compressible > > after changing an algorithm. This is possible, users may swith an > > algorithm to compress an incompressible page in the background. > > I don't understand the difference. If something is wrong with > the system causing the compression algorithm to fail, shouldn't > zswap just hobble along as if the page was incompressible? > > In fact it would be quite reasonble to try to recompress it if > the admin did change the algorithm later because the error may > have been specific to the previous algorithm implementation. > Somehow, I find your comment reasonable. Another point I want to mention is the semantic difference. For example, in a system with only one algorithm, a dst_buf overflow still means a successful swap-out. However, other errors actually indicate an I/O failure. In such cases, vmscan.c will log the relevant error in pageout() to notify the user. Anyway, I'm not an authority on this, so I’d like to see comments from Minchan, Sergey, and Yosry. > Of course I totally agree that there should be a reporting > mechanism to catch errors that admins/developers should know > about. But apart from reporting that error there should be > no difference between an inherently incompressible page vs. > buggy algorithm/broken hardware failing to compress the page. > > Cheers, > -- > Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ > PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt > Thanks Barry
