Re: [PATCH -next v2] uprobes: fix two zero old_folio bugs in __replace_page()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





在 2025/2/21 23:28, Oleg Nesterov 写道:
On 02/21, Tong Tiangen wrote:

--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -506,6 +506,11 @@ int uprobe_write_opcode(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct mm_struct *mm,
  	if (ret <= 0)
  		goto put_old;

+	if (is_zero_page(old_page)) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto put_old;
+	}

I agree with David, the subject looks a bit misleading.

And. I won't insist, this is cosmetic, but if you send V2 please consider
moving the "verify_opcode()" check down, after the is_zero_page/PageCompound
checks.

Oleg.

OK, check the validity of the old page first and modify the subject in
v3 .

Thanks.



.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux