On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 10:09:45AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 01:54:13PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 07:49:19PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: > > > On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:09:35 +0900 Byungchul Park wrote: > > > > Just in case that I don't understand what you meant and for better > > > > understanding, can you provide a simple and problematic example from > > > > the u-a-f? > > > > > > > Tell us if it is illegal to commit rape without pregnancy in your home town? > > > > Hillf, this is unacceptable language. You need to apologise. > > Agreed. WTF Hillf? Where did that come from? Is this how you talk to your > co-workers? > > I'll tell you what would happen in my home town. If someone said > that to a co-worker, they would likely be terminated. I can't agree with the "this is a firing offence" approach. We're a community, no one is employed by anyone else here; we work together because we have to and we have to figure out how to get along. We work via consensus, not appeals to authority. However - language like that can _and has_ driven away valuable and long standing members of our community, so people will feel strongly about this. Hillf, I'm going to share a story off list.
