Re: Re: [PATCH] mm: Remove redundant PageMemcgKmem(page) call

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Shengken.Lin@xxxxxxxxxxx" <Shengken.Lin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] mm: Remove redundant PageMemcgKmem(page) call
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 13:22:20 +0000
Cc: akpm <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-mm <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <202502201747552959016@amlogic.com>
References: <20250212020627.3461237-1-shengken.lin@amlogic.com> <Z6wjYQUxIstEqJHC@casper.infradead.org> <202502201747552959016@amlogic.com>

On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 05:47:56PM +0800, Shengken.Lin@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> If it can save a function call, then adding PageMemcgKmem(page)
> in include/linux/memcontrol.h would make the code more consistent.

The code is fine the way it is.

References:
- [PATCH] mm: Remove redundant PageMemcgKmem(page) call
  - From: Shengken Lin
- Re: [PATCH] mm: Remove redundant PageMemcgKmem(page) call
  - From: Matthew Wilcox
- Re: Re: [PATCH] mm: Remove redundant PageMemcgKmem(page) call
  - From: Shengken.Lin@xxxxxxxxxxx

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/4] mm: permit guard regions for file-backed/shmem mappings
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] hung_task: Show the blocker task if the task is hung on mutex
Previous by thread: Re: Re: [PATCH] mm: Remove redundant PageMemcgKmem(page) call
Next by thread: [PATCH 0/2] mm: Optimize folio_order.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux