Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm: page_table_check: use new iteration API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 19.02.25 03:17, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
The page_ext_next() function assumes that page extension objects for a
page order allocation always reside in the same memory section, which
may not be true and could lead to crashes. Use the new page_ext
iteration API instead.

Fixes: cf54f310d0d3 ("mm/hugetlb: use __GFP_COMP for gigantic folios")
Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <luizcap@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  mm/page_table_check.c | 39 ++++++++++++---------------------------
  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_table_check.c b/mm/page_table_check.c
index 509c6ef8de400..b52e04d31c809 100644
--- a/mm/page_table_check.c
+++ b/mm/page_table_check.c
@@ -62,24 +62,20 @@ static struct page_table_check *get_page_table_check(struct page_ext *page_ext)
   */
  static void page_table_check_clear(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long pgcnt)
  {
+	struct page_ext_iter iter;
  	struct page_ext *page_ext;
  	struct page *page;
-	unsigned long i;
  	bool anon;
if (!pfn_valid(pfn))
  		return;
page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
-	page_ext = page_ext_get(page);
-
-	if (!page_ext)
-		return;
-
  	BUG_ON(PageSlab(page));
  	anon = PageAnon(page);
- for (i = 0; i < pgcnt; i++) {
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	for_each_page_ext(page, pgcnt, page_ext, iter) {
  		struct page_table_check *ptc = get_page_table_check(page_ext);
if (anon) {
@@ -89,9 +85,8 @@ static void page_table_check_clear(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long pgcnt)
  			BUG_ON(atomic_read(&ptc->anon_map_count));
  			BUG_ON(atomic_dec_return(&ptc->file_map_count) < 0);
  		}
-		page_ext = page_ext_next(page_ext);
  	}
-	page_ext_put(page_ext);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
  }

[...]

/*
@@ -140,24 +130,19 @@ static void page_table_check_set(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long pgcnt,
   */
  void __page_table_check_zero(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
  {
+	struct page_ext_iter iter;
  	struct page_ext *page_ext;
-	unsigned long i;
BUG_ON(PageSlab(page)); - page_ext = page_ext_get(page);
-
-	if (!page_ext)
-		return;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < (1ul << order); i++) {
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	for_each_page_ext_order(page, order, page_ext, iter) {

I would avoid introducing for_each_page_ext_order() and just pass "1 << order" as the page count.

  		struct page_table_check *ptc = get_page_table_check(page_ext);
BUG_ON(atomic_read(&ptc->anon_map_count));
  		BUG_ON(atomic_read(&ptc->file_map_count));
-		page_ext = page_ext_next(page_ext);
  	}
-	page_ext_put(page_ext);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
  }
void __page_table_check_pte_clear(struct mm_struct *mm, pte_t pte)

Apart from that, this looks very nice to me

Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux