On 2/18/25 11:31, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Fri, 2025-02-14 at 10:51 -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: >> Would that make sense here? It would also preserve the "common case" >> optimization that's in arch_tlbbatch_flush(). >> > What we do in this patch goes out the window in patch > 10. This is just a temporary stage along the way to > what we have at the end of the series, needed to make > sure we don't break bisect partway through the series. > > I'm not sure we should be doing much with this patch. > > I could fold it into the next patch, but that would > make things harder to read. Ahh, that makes sense. If it's going out the window, could it be temporarily commented, please? Add the comment here and remove it in patch 10 (or whatever).
