On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 01:54:08PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > --- > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/severity.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/severity.c > index dac4d64dfb2a..cb021058165f 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/severity.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/severity.c > @@ -300,13 +300,12 @@ static noinstr int error_context(struct mce *m, struct pt_regs *regs) > copy_user = is_copy_from_user(regs); > instrumentation_end(); > > - switch (fixup_type) { > - case EX_TYPE_UACCESS: > - if (!copy_user) > - return IN_KERNEL; > - m->kflags |= MCE_IN_KERNEL_COPYIN; > - fallthrough; > + if (copy_user) { > + m->kflags |= MCE_IN_KERNEL_COPYIN | MCE_IN_KERNEL_COPYIN; Typing is hard, obviously that second should'be been _RECOV. > + return IN_KERNEL_RECOV But why are we having that bit *and* a return value saying the same thing? > + } > > + switch (fixup_type) { > case EX_TYPE_FAULT_MCE_SAFE: > case EX_TYPE_DEFAULT_MCE_SAFE: > m->kflags |= MCE_IN_KERNEL_RECOV;