Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/389] 6.6.76-rc2 review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 at 16:54, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 at 21:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.76 release.
> > There are 389 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sat, 08 Feb 2025 15:51:12 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.76-rc2.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
>
> There are three different regressions found and reporting here,
> We are working on bisecting and investigating these issues,

We observed a kernel warning on QEMU-ARM64 and FVP while running the
newly added selftest: arm64: check_hugetlb_options. This issue appears
on 6.6.76 onward and 6.12.13 onward, as reported in the stable review [1].
However, the test case passes successfully on stable 6.13.

The selftests: arm64: check_hugetlb_options test was introduced following
the recent upgrade of kselftest test sources to the stable 6.13 branch.
As you are aware, LKFT runs the latest kselftest sources (from stable
6.13.x) on 6.12.x, 6.6.x, and older kernels for validation purposes.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux