Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers/base/memory: Simplify add_boot_memory_block()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 16:35:03 +1000 Gavin Shan <gshan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> It's unnecessary to keep the variable @section_count in the function
> because the device for the specific memory block will be added if
> any of its memory section is present. The variable @section_count
> records the number of present memory sections in the specific memory
> block, which isn't needed.
> 
> Simplify the function by dropping the variable @section_count. No
> functional change intended.
> 
> ...
>
>  static int __init add_boot_memory_block(unsigned long base_section_nr)
>  {
> -	int section_count = 0;
>  	unsigned long nr;
>  
>  	for (nr = base_section_nr; nr < base_section_nr + sections_per_block;

mm/sparse.c has a for_each_present_section_nr() - is that usable here?

> -	     nr++)
> -		if (present_section_nr(nr))
> -			section_count++;
> +	     nr++) {
> +		if (present_section_nr(nr)) {
> +			return add_memory_block(memory_block_id(base_section_nr),
> +						MEM_ONLINE, NULL, NULL);
> +		}
> +	}
>
> ...
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux