On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 7:22 PM Christoph Lameter (Ampere) <cl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Feb 2025, Uros Bizjak wrote: > > > OTOH, all recent x86_64 processors support CMPXCHG128 insn, so the > > call alternative will be rarely used. > > Do we still support processors without cmpxchg128? If not then lets just > drop the calls from the kernel. I'm not aware of any discussion about that decision. Thanks, Uros.