On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 01:03:04PM +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 12:50 PM Lorenzo Stoakes > <lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Right, I don't mean the rust subsystem, I mean designated rust > > maintainers. The point being that this won't add workload to Andrew, nor > > require him nor other mm C people to understand rust. > > Sounds good, and apologies for being pedantic, but given the recent > discussions, I thought I should clarify just in case others read it > differently. > > In the same vein, one more quick thing (that you probably didn't mean > in this way, but still, I think it is better I add the note, sorry): I > don't think it is true that it will not add workload to Andrew or MM > in general. It always adds some workload, even if the maintainers > don't handle the patches at all, since they may still need to perform > a small change in something Rust related due to another change they > need to do, or perhaps at least contact the Rust sub-maintainer to do > it for them, etc. > > https://rust-for-linux.com/rust-kernel-policy#didnt-you-promise-rust-wouldnt-be-extra-work-for-maintainers > > Cheers, > Miguel Ack, for the record I'm happy to help with any work that might come up.
