Re: [PATCH v10 00/12] AMD broadcast TLB invalidation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/12] AMD broadcast TLB invalidation
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 11:23:49 +0100
Cc: x86@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bp@xxxxxxxxx, dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, zhengqi.arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, nadav.amit@xxxxxxxxx, thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx, kernel-team@xxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jackmanb@xxxxxxxxxx, jannh@xxxxxxxxxx, mhklinux@xxxxxxxxxxx, andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20250211210823.242681-1-riel@surriel.com>
References: <20250211210823.242681-1-riel@surriel.com>

On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 04:07:55PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Add support for broadcast TLB invalidation using AMD's INVLPGB instruction.

What tree are these patches against? I can't seem to cleanly apply them
to anything much :/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v10 00/12] AMD broadcast TLB invalidation
  - From: Brendan Jackman

References:
- [PATCH v10 00/12] AMD broadcast TLB invalidation
  - From: Rik van Riel

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/3] mm/mempolicy: export memory policy symbols
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v9 10/12] x86/mm: do targeted broadcast flushing from tlbbatch code
Previous by thread: [PATCH v10 04/12] x86/mm: get INVLPGB count max from CPUID
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v10 00/12] AMD broadcast TLB invalidation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux