Re: [PATCH 0/3] may miss to set node dead on destroy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:28:53AM -0500, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
>* Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx> [250211 03:11]:
>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 09:31:28AM -0500, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
>> >* Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx> [250207 20:26]:
>> >
>> >The subject of this patch set makes the issue sound much more sever than
>> >it is.  It currently sounds like a memory leak or a UAF, which isn't the
>> >case.
>> >
>> 
>> Not intend to exaggerate the impact.
>> 
>> Is this one would be better?
>> 
>>   maple_tree: make sure each node is dead on destroy
>
>Not really, you are fixing two nodes, one isn't even to do with the
>destry/dead node.  You are also not making sure each node is dead, but
>fixing an issue with the leaf node.
>
>maple_tree: Fix the replacement of a root leaf node ?
>

Thanks, it looks more precise.

BTW, after addressing your current comments, could I send a v2?

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux