Re: Possible regression with buffered writes + NOWAIT behavior, under memory pressure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 08:09:31AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Better to only do the FGP_NOWAIT check when a failure occurs; that
> puts it in the slow path rather than having to evaluate it
> unnecessarily every time through the function/loop. i.e.
> 
>  		folio = filemap_alloc_folio(gfp, order);
> -		if (!folio)
> -			return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +		if (!folio) {
> +			if (fgp_flags & FGP_NOWAIT)
> +				err = -EAGAIN;
> +			else
> +				err = -ENOMEM;
> +			continue;
> +		}

Or would we be better off handling ENOMEM the same way we handle EAGAIN?
eg something like:

+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -1842,7 +1842,7 @@ void io_wq_submit_work(struct io_wq_work *work)

        do {
                ret = io_issue_sqe(req, issue_flags);
-               if (ret != -EAGAIN)
+               if (ret != -EAGAIN || ret != -ENOMEM)
                        break;

                /*





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux