On 02/09, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> @@ -56,6 +56,8 @@ int task_work_add(struct task_struct *task, struct callback_head *work,
> {
> struct callback_head *head;
>
> + work->next = TASK_WORK_DEQUEUED;
Do we really need to do this at the start of task_work_add() ?
If the caller didn't do init_task_work() before and task_work_add()
returns -EINVAL we probably do not care?
Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
