Re: [PATCH] mm/mlock: Fix WARN_ON_ONCE condition.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 07/02/25 11:34 am, Liu Ye wrote:
The condition in WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu_online(cpu)) should be !cpu_online(cpu)
to ensure the warning is triggered when the CPU is offline.

Signed-off-by: Liu Ye <liuye@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  mm/mlock.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/mlock.c b/mm/mlock.c
index cde076fa7d5e..40acf7897917 100644
--- a/mm/mlock.c
+++ b/mm/mlock.c
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ void mlock_drain_remote(int cpu)
  {
  	struct folio_batch *fbatch;
- WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu_online(cpu));
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpu_online(cpu));
  	fbatch = &per_cpu(mlock_fbatch.fbatch, cpu);
  	if (folio_batch_count(fbatch))
  		mlock_folio_batch(fbatch);


No idea about this code path but mlock_drain_remote() is called by page_alloc_cpu_dead() which expects an offlined CPU according to the comments.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux