On 06/02/2025 07:52, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 15:09:40 +0000 Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I'm guessing that going in >> through the arm64 tree is the right approach here? > > Seems that way, just from the line counts. > > I suggest two series - one for the four cc:stable patches and one for > the 6.14 material. This depends on whether the ARM maintainers want to > get patches 1-4 into the -stable stream before the 6.14 release. Thanks Andrew, I'm happy to take this approach assuming Catalin/Will agree. But to be pedantic for a moment, I nominated patches 1-3 and 13 as candidates for stable. 1-3 should definitely go via arm64. 13 is a pure mm fix. But later arm64 patches in the series depend on it being fixed. So I wouldn't want to put 13 in through mm tree if it means 14-16 will be in the arm64 tree without the fix for a while. Anyway, 13 doesn't depend on anything before it in the series so I can gather the fixes in to a series of 4 as you suggest. Then the improvements become a series of 12. And both can go via arm64? I'll gather review comments then re-post as 2 series for v2; assuming Will/Catalin are happy. Thanks, Ryan
