On Wed, 2025-02-05 at 14:51 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > How about we do something like this instead? > > This keeps all the TLBSYNC in the same task as the INVLPGB, without > making things complicated and allowing random CR3 writes in between > them -- which makes my head hurt. I like your idea better! Guess I should go make and test a v9 with the WARN_ONCE in patch 3, and these changes :) -- All Rights Reversed.
