Now, swap_count_continued() has two callers, __swap_duplicate() and __swap_entry_free_locked(), the relevant code comment is stale. Update it to reflect the current situation. Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx> --- mm/swapfile.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c index bf284ba16198..9ee2238042a5 100644 --- a/mm/swapfile.c +++ b/mm/swapfile.c @@ -3789,8 +3789,8 @@ int add_swap_count_continuation(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask) * into, carry if so, or else fail until a new continuation page is allocated; * when the original swap_map count is decremented from 0 with continuation, * borrow from the continuation and report whether it still holds more. - * Called while __swap_duplicate() or swap_entry_free() holds swap or cluster - * lock. + * Called while __swap_duplicate() or caller of __swap_entry_free_locked() + * holds swap or cluster lock. */ static bool swap_count_continued(struct swap_info_struct *si, pgoff_t offset, unsigned char count) -- 2.41.0
