There are two predicates in the name of swap_is_has_cache() which
is confusing. Renaming it to remove the confusion and can better
reflect its functionality.
Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/swapfile.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
index 61efde853eea..bf284ba16198 100644
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static long swap_usage_in_pages(struct swap_info_struct *si)
/* Reclaim directly, bypass the slot cache and don't touch device lock */
#define TTRS_DIRECT 0x8
-static bool swap_is_has_cache(struct swap_info_struct *si,
+static bool swap_only_has_cache(struct swap_info_struct *si,
unsigned long offset, int nr_pages)
{
unsigned char *map = si->swap_map + offset;
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ static int __try_to_reclaim_swap(struct swap_info_struct *si,
* reference or pending writeback, and can't be allocated to others.
*/
ci = lock_cluster(si, offset);
- need_reclaim = swap_is_has_cache(si, offset, nr_pages);
+ need_reclaim = swap_only_has_cache(si, offset, nr_pages);
unlock_cluster(ci);
if (!need_reclaim)
goto out_unlock;
@@ -1572,7 +1572,7 @@ void put_swap_folio(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry)
return;
ci = lock_cluster(si, offset);
- if (swap_is_has_cache(si, offset, size))
+ if (swap_only_has_cache(si, offset, size))
swap_entry_range_free(si, ci, entry, size);
else {
for (int i = 0; i < size; i++, entry.val++) {
--
2.41.0
