On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 10:28:47AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > Following the move of TREE_RCU implementation, let's move also the > TINY_RCU one for consistency and subsequent refactoring. > > For simplicity, remove the separate inline __kvfree_call_rcu() as > TINY_RCU is not meant for high-performance hardware anyway. > > Declare kvfree_call_rcu() in rcupdate.h to avoid header dependency > issues. > > Also move the kvfree_rcu_barrier() declaration to slab.h > > Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@xxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Looks good to me, Reviewed-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> -- Harry
