Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] exit: perform add_device_randomness() without tasklist_lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/01, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
>
> +	add_device_randomness((const void*) &p->se.sum_exec_runtime,
> +			      sizeof(unsigned long long));

I won't insist, but do we really need to keep this ugly "(const void*)"
typecast? and perhaps sizeof(p->se.sum_exec_runtime) will look a bit
better?

Oleg.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux