Instead of smuggling the tty pointer directly, use a struct so that more things can be added later. Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@xxxxxxxxx> --- kernel/exit.c | 22 +++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c index 257dd8ed45ea..d2c74f93f7d2 100644 --- a/kernel/exit.c +++ b/kernel/exit.c @@ -122,6 +122,13 @@ static __init int kernel_exit_sysfs_init(void) late_initcall(kernel_exit_sysfs_init); #endif +/* + * For things release_task() would like to do *after* tasklist_lock is released. + */ +struct release_task_post { + struct tty_struct *tty; +}; + static void __unhash_process(struct task_struct *p, bool group_dead) { nr_threads--; @@ -141,12 +148,11 @@ static void __unhash_process(struct task_struct *p, bool group_dead) /* * This function expects the tasklist_lock write-locked. */ -static void __exit_signal(struct task_struct *tsk) +static void __exit_signal(struct release_task_post *post, struct task_struct *tsk) { struct signal_struct *sig = tsk->signal; bool group_dead = thread_group_leader(tsk); struct sighand_struct *sighand; - struct tty_struct *tty; u64 utime, stime; sighand = rcu_dereference_check(tsk->sighand, @@ -160,7 +166,7 @@ static void __exit_signal(struct task_struct *tsk) #endif if (group_dead) { - tty = sig->tty; + post->tty = sig->tty; sig->tty = NULL; } else { /* @@ -207,10 +213,8 @@ static void __exit_signal(struct task_struct *tsk) __cleanup_sighand(sighand); clear_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_SIGPENDING); - if (group_dead) { + if (group_dead) flush_sigqueue(&sig->shared_pending); - tty_kref_put(tty); - } } static void delayed_put_task_struct(struct rcu_head *rhp) @@ -236,10 +240,13 @@ void __weak release_thread(struct task_struct *dead_task) void release_task(struct task_struct *p) { + struct release_task_post post; struct task_struct *leader; struct pid *thread_pid; int zap_leader; repeat: + memset(&post, 0, sizeof(post)); + /* don't need to get the RCU readlock here - the process is dead and * can't be modifying its own credentials. But shut RCU-lockdep up */ rcu_read_lock(); @@ -252,7 +259,7 @@ void release_task(struct task_struct *p) write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock); ptrace_release_task(p); - __exit_signal(p); + __exit_signal(&post, p); /* * If we are the last non-leader member of the thread @@ -280,6 +287,7 @@ void release_task(struct task_struct *p) sizeof(unsigned long long)); release_thread(p); put_task_struct_rcu_user(p); + tty_kref_put(post.tty); p = leader; if (unlikely(zap_leader)) -- 2.43.0