Hello,
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 06:12:01PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> +static void memcg_stop_kmem_account(void)
> +{
> + if (!current->mm)
> + return;
> +
> + current->memcg_kmem_skip_account++;
> +}
> +
> +static void memcg_resume_kmem_account(void)
> +{
> + if (!current->mm)
> + return;
> +
> + current->memcg_kmem_skip_account--;
> +}
I can't say I'm a big fan of this approach. If there are enough
users, maybe but can't we just annotate the affected allocations
explicitly? Is this gonna have many more users?
Also, in general, can we please add some comments? I know memcg code
is dearth of comments but let's please not keep it that way.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>