On 09/21/2012 01:40 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote: > Hi Glauber, > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> This is a followup to the previous kmem series. I divided them logically >> so it gets easier for reviewers. But I believe they are ready to be merged >> together (although we can do a two-pass merge if people would prefer) >> >> Throwaway git tree found at: >> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/glommer/memcg.git kmemcg-slab >> >> There are mostly bugfixes since last submission. > > Overall, I like this series a lot. However, I don't really see this as a > v3.7 material because we already have largeish pending updates to the > slab allocators. I also haven't seen any performance numbers for this > which is a problem. > > So what I'd really like to see is this series being merged early in the > v3.8 development cycle to maximize the number of people eyeballing the > code and looking at performance impact. > > Does this sound reasonable to you Glauber? Absolutely. As I've stated before, I actually believe the kmemcg-stack and kmemcg-slab (this one) portions should be merged separately. (So we can sort out issues more easily, and point to the right place) The first one is a lot more stable and got a lot more love. The goal of this one is to get it reviewed so we can merge as soon as we can - but not sooner. early v3.8 sounds perfect to me. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>