Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] CMA reservation optimizations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 28.01.25 02:04, Juan Yescas wrote:
Hi LSF organizers,

I would like to continue discussing this topic with the mm community:

"CMA reservation optimizations"

Note: There is already an email in the linux-mm mailing list that is
discussing this issue. The title is:

"CMA reservations require 32MiB alignment in 16KiB page size kernels
instead of 8MiB in 4KiB page size kernel"

Background

When the drivers reserve CMA memory in 16KiB kernels, the minimum
alignment is 32 MiB as per CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES. However, in 4KiB
kernels, the CMA alignment is 4MiB.

I'm curious, here you say 4 MiB, above 8 MiB.

But nowadays it's usually 2 MiB (pageblock size), no?

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux