On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Glauber Costa wrote:
> index f2d760c..18de3f6 100644
> --- a/mm/slab.c
> +++ b/mm/slab.c
> @@ -3938,9 +3938,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__kmalloc);
> * Free an object which was previously allocated from this
> * cache.
> */
> -void kmem_cache_free(struct kmem_cache *cachep, void *objp)
> +void kmem_cache_free(struct kmem_cache *s, void *objp)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
> + struct kmem_cache *cachep = virt_to_cache(objp);
> +
> + VM_BUG_ON(!slab_equal_or_parent(cachep, s));
>
This is an extremely hot path of the kernel and you are adding significant
processing. Check how the benchmarks are influenced by this change.
virt_to_cache can be a bit expensive.
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 4778548..a045dfc 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -2604,7 +2604,9 @@ void kmem_cache_free(struct kmem_cache *s, void *x)
>
> page = virt_to_head_page(x);
>
> - slab_free(s, page, x, _RET_IP_);
> + VM_BUG_ON(!slab_equal_or_parent(page->slab, s));
> +
> + slab_free(page->slab, page, x, _RET_IP_);
>
Less of a problem here but you are eroding one advantage that slab has had
in the past over slub in terms of freeing objects.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>