On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 09:53:53AM +0800, yukaixiong wrote: > > > On 2025/1/14 21:50, Joel Granados wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 03:07:35PM +0800, Kaixiong Yu wrote: > > > This patch series moves sysctls of vm_table in kernel/sysctl.c to > > > places where they actually belong, and do some related code clean-ups. > > > After this patch series, all sysctls in vm_table have been moved into its > > > own files, meanwhile, delete vm_table. > > > > > > All the modifications of this patch series base on > > > linux-next(tags/next-20250110). To test this patch series, the code was > > > compiled with both the CONFIG_SYSCTL enabled and disabled on arm64 and > > > x86_64 architectures. After this patch series is applied, all files > > > under /proc/sys/vm can be read or written normally. > > It is looking good! Here is how I think we should move it upstream: > > > > 1. These should queued in for 6.15 instead of the next merge window. > > It is too late in the current cycle and if we put it in now, it will > > not properly tested in linux-next. > > > > 2. I am putting this in sysctl-testing with the expectation of pushing this > > up for the 6.15 merge window. Please tell me if you want this to go > > through some other tree. > > > > Thx for the contribution > > > > Best > > Thank you! I don't want this to go through some other tree. This was more for the mm, net and security maintainers :) > > Best ... > > > my test steps as below listed: > > > > > > Step 1: Set CONFIG_SYSCTL to 'n' and compile the Linux kernel on the > > > arm64 architecture. The kernel compiles successfully without any errors > > > or warnings. > > > > > ... > > > mm/swap.c | 16 ++- > > > mm/swap.h | 1 + > > > mm/util.c | 67 +++++++-- > > > mm/vmscan.c | 23 +++ > > > mm/vmstat.c | 44 +++++- > > > net/sunrpc/auth.c | 2 +- > > > security/min_addr.c | 11 ++ > > > 23 files changed, 336 insertions(+), 312 deletions(-) > > > > > > -- > > > 2.34.1 > > > > -- Joel Granados
