On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 9:57 AM Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 1/15/25 03:17, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > When gfpflags_allow_spinning() == false spin_locks cannot be taken. > > Make failslab, kfence, kmemleak compliant. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx> > > All these are related to slab, so this would rather belong to a followup > series that expands the support from page allocator to slab, no? Sure. I can drop it for now. It was more of the preview of things to come. And how gfpflags_allow_spinning() fits in other places.
