On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 17:30:20 +0000 Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I sort of favour putting hotfixes in quick, but this one has gone in > quicker than some reviewed hotfixes which we left in unstable... however > towards the end of a cycle I think Andrew is stuck between a rock and a > hard place in deciding how to handle these. > > So I'm guessing the heuristic is 'allow to simmer in unstable if time > permits in cycle', if known 'good egg' + no objection + towards end of > cycle + hotfix - send. Yup. Plus this patch had such a convincing changelog ;)