Nikhil Dhama <nikhil.dhama@xxxxxxx> writes: >> The present division by two appears to be somewhat randomly chosen. >> And as far as I can tell, this patch proposes replacing that with >> another somewhat random adjustment. >> >> What's the actual design here? What are we attempting to do and why, >> and why is the proposed design superior to the present one? > > We are further analyzing both the designs and their impact on pcp list. > > >> Nice, but might other workloads on other machines get slower? > > We are studying the impact of this on other network workloads like netperf, > and will post those results soon. To tune this parameter, in addition to network workloads, other kinds of workloads need be evaluated too. --- Best Regards, Huang, Ying