On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 18:53:11 -0800 Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 5:49 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Yes, we're at -rc7 and this series is rather in panic mode and it seems > > unnecessarily risky so I'm inclined to set it aside for this cycle. > > > > If the series is considered super desirable and if people are confident > > that we can address any remaining glitches during two months of -rc > > then sure, we could push the envelope a bit. But I don't believe this > > is the case so I'm thinking let's give ourselves another cycle to get > > this all sorted out? > > I didn't think this series was in panic mode with one real issue that > is not hard to address (memory ordering in > __refcount_inc_not_zero_limited()) but I'm obviously biased and might > be missing the big picture. In any case, if it makes people nervous I > have no objections to your plan. Well, I'm soliciting opinions here. What do others think? And do you see much urgency with these changes?
