On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 09:11:52 -0800 Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@xxxxxxxxxx> > I see your point. I think it's a strong argument to use atomic > directly instead of refcount for this locking. I'll try that and see > how it looks. Thanks for the feedback! > Better not before having a clear answer to why is it sane to invent anything like rwsem in 2025. What, the 40 bytes? Nope it is the fair price paid for finer locking granuality. BTW Vlastimil, the cc list is cut down because I have to walk around the spam check on the mail agent side.
