Ping. regards, dan carpenter On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 03:07:15PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > Most of these sizes and counts are capped at 256MB so the math doesn't > result in an integer overflow. The "relocs" count needs to be checked > as well. Otherwise on 32bit systems the calculation of "full_data" > could be wrong. > > full_data = data_len + relocs * sizeof(unsigned long); > > Fixes: c995ee28d29d ("binfmt_flat: prevent kernel dammage from corrupted executable headers") > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/binfmt_flat.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/binfmt_flat.c b/fs/binfmt_flat.c > index 390808ce935d..b5b5ca1a44f7 100644 > --- a/fs/binfmt_flat.c > +++ b/fs/binfmt_flat.c > @@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ static int load_flat_file(struct linux_binprm *bprm, > * 28 bits (256 MB) is way more than reasonable in this case. > * If some top bits are set we have probable binary corruption. > */ > - if ((text_len | data_len | bss_len | stack_len | full_data) >> 28) { > + if ((text_len | data_len | bss_len | stack_len | relocs | full_data) >> 28) { > pr_err("bad header\n"); > ret = -ENOEXEC; > goto err; > -- > 2.45.2