[RFC PATCH 0/5] Accelerate page migration with batching and multi threads

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all,

This patchset accelerates page migration by batching folio copy operations and
using multiple CPU threads and is based on Shivank's Enhancements to Page
Migration with Batch Offloading via DMA patchset[1] and my original accelerate
page migration patchset[2]. It is on top of mm-everything-2025-01-03-05-59.
The last patch is for testing purpose and should not be considered.

The motivations are:

1. Batching folio copy increases copy throughput. Especially for base page
migrations, folio copy throughput is low since there are kernel activities like
moving folio metadata and updating page table entries sit between two folio
copies. And base page sizes are relatively small, 4KB on x86_64, ARM64
and 64KB on ARM64.

2. Single CPU thread has limited copy throughput. Using multi threads is
a natural extension to speed up folio copy, when DMA engine is NOT
available in a system.


Design
===

It is based on Shivank's patchset and revise MIGRATE_SYNC_NO_COPY
(renamed to MIGRATE_NO_COPY) to avoid folio copy operation inside
migrate_folio_move() and perform them in one shot afterwards. A
copy_page_lists_mt() function is added to use multi threads to copy
folios from src list to dst list.

Changes compared to Shivank's patchset (mainly rewrote batching folio
copy code)
===

1. mig_info is removed, so no memory allocation is needed during
batching folio copies. src->private is used to store old page state and
anon_vma after folio metadata is copied from src to dst.

2. move_to_new_folio() and migrate_folio_move() are refactored to remove
redundant code in migrate_folios_batch_move().

3. folio_mc_copy() is used for the single threaded copy code to keep the
original kernel behavior.


Performance
===

I benchmarked move_pages() throughput on a two socket NUMA system with two
NVIDIA Grace CPUs. The base page size is 64KB. Both 64KB page migration and 2MB
mTHP page migration are measured.

The tables below show move_pages() throughput with different
configurations and different numbers of copied pages. The x-axis is the
configurations, from vanilla Linux kernel to using 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32
threads with this patchset applied. And the unit is GB/s.

The 32-thread copy throughput can be up to 10x of single thread serial folio
copy. Batching folio copy not only benefits huge page but also base
page.

64KB (GB/s):

		vanilla	mt_1	mt_2	mt_4	mt_8	mt_16	mt_32
32		5.43	4.90	5.65	7.31	7.60	8.61	6.43
256		6.95	6.89	9.28	14.67	22.41	23.39	23.93
512		7.88	7.26	10.15	17.53	27.82	27.88	33.93
768		7.65	7.42	10.46	18.59	28.65	29.67	30.76
1024	7.46	8.01	10.90	17.77	27.04	32.18	38.80

2MB mTHP (GB/s):

		vanilla	mt_1	mt_2	mt_4	mt_8	mt_16	mt_32
1		5.94	2.90	6.90	8.56	11.16	8.76	6.41
2		7.67	5.57	7.11	12.48	17.37	15.68	14.10
4		8.01	6.04	10.25	20.14	22.52	27.79	25.28
8		8.42	7.00	11.41	24.73	33.96	32.62	39.55
16		9.41	6.91	12.23	27.51	43.95	49.15	51.38
32		10.23	7.15	13.03	29.52	49.49	69.98	71.51
64		9.40	7.37	13.88	30.38	52.00	76.89	79.41
128		8.59	7.23	14.20	28.39	49.98	78.27	90.18
256		8.43	7.16	14.59	28.14	48.78	76.88	92.28
512		8.31	7.78	14.40	26.20	43.31	63.91	75.21
768		8.30	7.86	14.83	27.41	46.25	69.85	81.31
1024	8.31	7.90	14.96	27.62	46.75	71.76	83.84


TODOs
===
1. Multi-threaded folio copy routine needs to look at CPU scheduler and
only use idle CPUs to avoid interfering userspace workloads. Of course
more complicated policies can be used based on migration issuing thread
priority.

2. Eliminate memory allocation during multi-threaded folio copy routine
if possible.

3. A runtime check to decide when use multi-threaded folio copy.
Something like cache hotness issue mentioned by Matthew[3].

4. Use non-temporal CPU instructions to avoid cache pollution issues.

5. Explicitly make multi-threaded folio copy only available to
!HIGHMEM, since kmap_local_page() would be needed for each kernel
folio copy work threads and expensive.

6. A better interface than copy_page_lists_mt() to allow DMA data copy
to be used as well.

Let me know your thoughts. Thanks.


[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20240614221525.19170-1-shivankg@xxxxxxx/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20190404020046.32741-1-zi.yan@xxxxxxxx/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/Zm0SWZKcRrngCUUW@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Byungchul Park (1):
  mm: separate move/undo doing on folio list from migrate_pages_batch()

Zi Yan (4):
  mm/migrate: factor out code in move_to_new_folio() and
    migrate_folio_move()
  mm/migrate: add migrate_folios_batch_move to batch the folio move
    operations
  mm/migrate: introduce multi-threaded page copy routine
  test: add sysctl for folio copy tests and adjust
    NR_MAX_BATCHED_MIGRATION

 include/linux/migrate.h      |   3 +
 include/linux/migrate_mode.h |   2 +
 include/linux/mm.h           |   4 +
 include/linux/sysctl.h       |   1 +
 kernel/sysctl.c              |  29 ++-
 mm/Makefile                  |   2 +-
 mm/copy_pages.c              | 190 +++++++++++++++
 mm/migrate.c                 | 443 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 8 files changed, 577 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 mm/copy_pages.c

-- 
2.45.2





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux