Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] mm: multi-gen LRU: per-process heatmaps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: <yuanchu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] mm: multi-gen LRU: per-process heatmaps
From: Muyang Tian <tianmuyang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2025 11:15:26 +0800
Cc: <Michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <corbet@xxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>, <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx>, <yanan@xxxxxxxxxx>, <xiesongyang@xxxxxxxxxx>, <wuchangye@xxxxxxxxxx>, <liuxin350@xxxxxxxxxx>, <zhangmingyi5@xxxxxxxxxx>, <liwei883@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20220911083418.2818369-1-yuanchu@google.com>
References: <20220911083418.2818369-1-yuanchu@google.com>

Hi all,
It has been a long time since this patchset[0] submitted, and I've been doing something similar recently.
I wonder why this patchset remains unmerged/uncommented? Is there any other similar work?

Thanks!

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220911083418.2818369-1-yuanchu@xxxxxxxxxx/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] mm: multi-gen LRU: per-process heatmaps
  - From: Yuanchu Xie

Prev by Date: [RFC PATCH 8/9 v2] cgroup: remove bpf rstat flush from css generic flush
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v4 10/15] riscv: pgtable: move pagetable_dtor() to __tlb_remove_table()
Previous by thread: [RFC PATCH 0/9 v2] cgroup: separate per-subsystem rstat trees
Next by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] mm: multi-gen LRU: per-process heatmaps
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux