On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 01:43:09PM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote: > >> Use signed data type for version handling > >> in shmem_parse_opt_casefold() > > How do you think about to move this information into the summary phrase? > > should i add more info to this? as i am still not able to understand what i need to do here. Can you please suggest what changes are you suggesting here. > … > >> --- > >> Coverity Message: > >> CID 1601569: (#1 of 1): Unsigned compared against 0 (NO_EFFECT) > >> unsigned_compare: This less-than-zero comparison of an unsigned > >> value is never true. version < 0U > … > > May such information become a part for the final change description? > ofcoure not, as per my understanding, text after '---' are not included in the change descriptions. (Do correct me if i am wrong here) Thus no need to worry for them getting added in the change log. Thank you, Karan. > Regards, > Markus
