On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 1:30 AM Chen Ridong <chenridong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The page reclaim isolates a batch of folios from the tail of one of the
> LRU lists and works on those folios one by one. For a suitable
> swap-backed folio, if the swap device is async, it queues that folio for
> writeback. After the page reclaim finishes an entire batch, it puts back
> the folios it queued for writeback to the head of the original LRU list.
>
> In the meantime, the page writeback flushes the queued folios also by
> batches. Its batching logic is independent from that of the page reclaim.
> For each of the folios it writes back, the page writeback calls
> folio_rotate_reclaimable() which tries to rotate a folio to the tail.
>
> folio_rotate_reclaimable() only works for a folio after the page reclaim
> has put it back. If an async swap device is fast enough, the page
> writeback can finish with that folio while the page reclaim is still
> working on the rest of the batch containing it. In this case, that folio
> will remain at the head and the page reclaim will not retry it before
> reaching there.
For starters, copying & pasting others' commit messages as your own is
plagiarism. You need to quote them.
> The commit 359a5e1416ca ("mm: multi-gen LRU: retry folios written back
> while isolated") only fixed the issue for mglru. However, this issue
> also exists in the traditional active/inactive LRU.
You need to prove it with some numbers.
> This issue will be
> worse if THP is split, which makes the list longer and needs longer time
> to finish a batch of folios reclaim.
>
> This issue should be fixed in the same way for the traditional LRU.
> Therefore, the common logic was extracted to the 'find_folios_written_back'
> function firstly, which is then reused in the 'shrink_inactive_list'
> function. Finally, retry reclaiming those folios that may have missed the
> rotation for traditional LRU.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/20241010081802.290893-1-chenridong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/CAGsJ_4zqL8ZHNRZ44o_CC69kE7DBVXvbZfvmQxMGiFqRxqHQdA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> Signed-off-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Barry Song <baohua@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> v5->v6:
> - fix compile error(implicit declaration of function 'lru_gen_distance')
> when CONFIG_LRU_GEN is disable.
Did you build-test it this time? I don't think LRU_REFS_FLAGS is
defined when CONFIG_LRU_GEN=y.
> - rename 'is_retried' to is_retrying suggested by Barry Song.
>
> v5: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/CAGsJ_4x3Aj7wieK1FQKQC4Vbz5N+1dExs=Q70KQt-whS1dMxpw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>
> include/linux/mm_inline.h | 5 ++
> mm/vmscan.c | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
