Re: [PATCH 01/11] x86/mm: make MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE unconditional

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Very happy to see this change!

On 2024/12/23 10:55, Rik van Riel wrote:
Currently x86 usse CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_TABLE_FREE when using
                ^
                use

paravirt, and not when running on bare metal.

There is no real good reason to do things differently for
each setup. Make them all the same.

Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/x86/Kconfig           | 2 +-
  arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c | 7 +------
  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 9d7bd0ae48c4..e8743f8c9fd0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ config X86
  	select HAVE_PCI
  	select HAVE_PERF_REGS
  	select HAVE_PERF_USER_STACK_DUMP
-	select MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE	if PARAVIRT
+	select MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE
  	select MMU_GATHER_MERGE_VMAS
  	select HAVE_POSIX_CPU_TIMERS_TASK_WORK
  	select HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c
index fec381533555..2b78a6b466ed 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c
@@ -59,11 +59,6 @@ void __init native_pv_lock_init(void)
  		static_branch_enable(&virt_spin_lock_key);
  }
-static void native_tlb_remove_table(struct mmu_gather *tlb, void *table)
-{
-	tlb_remove_page(tlb, table);
-}
-
  struct static_key paravirt_steal_enabled;
  struct static_key paravirt_steal_rq_enabled;
@@ -191,7 +186,7 @@ struct paravirt_patch_template pv_ops = {
  	.mmu.flush_tlb_kernel	= native_flush_tlb_global,
  	.mmu.flush_tlb_one_user	= native_flush_tlb_one_user,
  	.mmu.flush_tlb_multi	= native_flush_tlb_multi,
-	.mmu.tlb_remove_table	= native_tlb_remove_table,
+	.mmu.tlb_remove_table	= tlb_remove_table,
.mmu.exit_mmap = paravirt_nop,
  	.mmu.notify_page_enc_status_changed	= paravirt_nop,

It look like this patch series is not based on the latest linux-next.

In addition to the above case, maybe the paravirt_tlb_remove_table()
in arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c also needs to be changed to tlb_remove_table()?

Thanks,
Qi




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux