On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 6:36 AM, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Sep 2012 at 18:03 GMT, Shentino <shentino@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Just curious, but what theoretically would happen if someone were to
>> want to set swappiness to 200 or something?
>>
>> Should it be sorta like vfs_cache_pressure?
>>
>
>
> How could it be set to 200? As 0~100 is valid:
>
> {
> .procname = "swappiness",
> .data = &vm_swappiness,
> .maxlen = sizeof(vm_swappiness),
> .mode = 0644,
> .proc_handler = proc_dointvec_minmax,
> .extra1 = &zero,
> .extra2 = &one_hundred,
> },
My comment/question was more abstract and focusing on the comparison
to vfs_cache_pressure.
:P
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>