Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/6] mm, bpf: Introduce try_alloc_pages() for opportunistic page allocation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 07:07:14PM -0800, alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
[...]
> +
> +struct page *try_alloc_pages_noprof(int nid, unsigned int order)
> +{
> +	gfp_t alloc_gfp = __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ZERO |
> +			  __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_TRYLOCK;

I think the above needs a comment to be more clear. Basically why zero,
nomemalloc and no warn? Otherwise this looks good. I don't have a strong
opinion on __GFP_TRYLOCK and maybe just ALLOC_TRYLOCK would be good
enough.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux