Re: [RFC PATCH 05/12] khugepaged: Generalize __collapse_huge_page_isolate()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 17/12/24 10:02 am, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 10:20:58PM +0530, Dev Jain wrote:
  {
-	struct page *page = NULL;
-	struct folio *folio = NULL;
-	pte_t *_pte;
+	unsigned int max_ptes_shared = khugepaged_max_ptes_shared >> (HPAGE_PMD_ORDER - order);
+	unsigned int max_ptes_none = khugepaged_max_ptes_none >> (HPAGE_PMD_ORDER - order);
  	int none_or_zero = 0, shared = 0, result = SCAN_FAIL, referenced = 0;
+	struct folio *folio = NULL;
+	struct page *page = NULL;
why are you moving variables around unnecessarily?

In a previous work, I moved code around and David noted to arrange the declarations
in reverse Xmas tree order. I guess (?) that was not spoiling git history, so if
this feels like that, I will revert.


  	bool writable = false;
+	pte_t *_pte;
- for (_pte = pte; _pte < pte + HPAGE_PMD_NR;
+
+	for (_pte = pte; _pte < pte + (1UL << order);
spurious blank line

My bad



also you might first want to finish off the page->folio conversion in
this function first; we have a vm_normal_folio() now.

I did not add any code before we derive the folio...I'm sorry, I don't get what you mean...





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux