Re: [PATCH v11 4/8] mm: rust: add lock_vma_under_rcu

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Currently, the binder driver always uses the mmap lock to make changes
> to its vma. Because the mmap lock is global to the process, this can
> involve significant contention. However, the kernel has a feature called
> per-vma locks, which can significantly reduce contention. For example,
> you can take a vma lock in parallel with an mmap write lock. This is
> important because contention on the mmap lock has been a long-term
> recurring challenge for the Binder driver.
>
> This patch introduces support for using `lock_vma_under_rcu` from Rust.
> The Rust Binder driver will be able to use this to reduce contention on
> the mmap lock.
>
> Acked-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx> (for mm bits)
> Reviewed-by: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  rust/helpers/mm.c |  5 +++++
>  rust/kernel/mm.rs | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 61 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/rust/helpers/mm.c b/rust/helpers/mm.c
> index 7b72eb065a3e..81b510c96fd2 100644
> --- a/rust/helpers/mm.c
> +++ b/rust/helpers/mm.c
> @@ -43,3 +43,8 @@ struct vm_area_struct *rust_helper_vma_lookup(struct mm_struct *mm,
>  {
>  	return vma_lookup(mm, addr);
>  }
> +
> +void rust_helper_vma_end_read(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> +	vma_end_read(vma);
> +}
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/mm.rs b/rust/kernel/mm.rs
> index ace8e7d57afe..425b73a9dfe6 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/mm.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/mm.rs
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>  use core::{ops::Deref, ptr::NonNull};
>
>  pub mod virt;
> +use virt::VmAreaRef;
>
>  /// A wrapper for the kernel's `struct mm_struct`.
>  ///
> @@ -170,6 +171,32 @@ pub unsafe fn from_raw<'a>(ptr: *const bindings::mm_struct) -> &'a MmWithUser {
>          unsafe { &*ptr.cast() }
>      }
>
> +    /// Attempt to access a vma using the vma read lock.
> +    ///
> +    /// This is an optimistic trylock operation, so it may fail if there is contention. In that
> +    /// case, you should fall back to taking the mmap read lock.
> +    ///
> +    /// When per-vma locks are disabled, this always returns `None`.
> +    #[inline]
> +    pub fn lock_vma_under_rcu(&self, vma_addr: usize) -> Option<VmaReadGuard<'_>> {
> +        #[cfg(CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK)]
> +        {
> +            // SAFETY: Calling `bindings::lock_vma_under_rcu` is always okay given an mm where
> +            // `mm_users` is non-zero.
> +            let vma = unsafe { bindings::lock_vma_under_rcu(self.as_raw(), vma_addr as _) };

Is `as _` the right approach here?


Best regards,
Andreas Hindborg






[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux