Re: [PATCH V4] mm, compaction: don't use ALLOC_CMA in long term GUP flow

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2024/12/15 18:01, yangge1116@xxxxxxx wrote:
From: yangge <yangge1116@xxxxxxx>

Since commit 984fdba6a32e ("mm, compaction: use proper alloc_flags
in __compaction_suitable()") allow compaction to proceed when free
pages required for compaction reside in the CMA pageblocks, it's
possible that __compaction_suitable() always returns true, and in
some cases, it's not acceptable.

There are 4 NUMA nodes on my machine, and each NUMA node has 32GB
of memory. I have configured 16GB of CMA memory on each NUMA node,
and starting a 32GB virtual machine with device passthrough is
extremely slow, taking almost an hour.

During the start-up of the virtual machine, it will call
pin_user_pages_remote(..., FOLL_LONGTERM, ...) to allocate memory.
Long term GUP cannot allocate memory from CMA area, so a maximum
of 16 GB of no-CMA memory on a NUMA node can be used as virtual
machine memory. Since there is 16G of free CMA memory on the NUMA
node, watermark for order-0 always be met for compaction, so
__compaction_suitable() always returns true, even if the node is
unable to allocate non-CMA memory for the virtual machine.

For costly allocations, because __compaction_suitable() always
returns true, __alloc_pages_slowpath() can't exit at the appropriate
place, resulting in excessively long virtual machine startup times.
Call trace:
__alloc_pages_slowpath
     if (compact_result == COMPACT_SKIPPED ||
         compact_result == COMPACT_DEFERRED)
         goto nopage; // should exit __alloc_pages_slowpath() from here

In order to quickly fall back to remote node, we should remove
ALLOC_CMA both in __compaction_suitable() and __isolate_free_page()
in long term GUP flow. After this fix, starting a 32GB virtual machine
with device passthrough takes only a few seconds.

Fixes: 984fdba6a32e ("mm, compaction: use proper alloc_flags in __compaction_suitable()")
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: yangge <yangge1116@xxxxxxx>
---

V4:
- rich the commit log description

V3:
- fix build errors
- add ALLOC_CMA both in should_continue_reclaim() and compaction_ready()

V2:
- using the 'cc->alloc_flags' to determin if 'ALLOC_CMA' is needed
- rich the commit log description

  include/linux/compaction.h |  6 ++++--
  mm/compaction.c            | 18 +++++++++++-------
  mm/page_alloc.c            |  4 +++-
  mm/vmscan.c                |  4 ++--
  4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/compaction.h b/include/linux/compaction.h
index e947764..b4c3ac3 100644
--- a/include/linux/compaction.h
+++ b/include/linux/compaction.h
@@ -90,7 +90,8 @@ extern enum compact_result try_to_compact_pages(gfp_t gfp_mask,
  		struct page **page);
  extern void reset_isolation_suitable(pg_data_t *pgdat);
  extern bool compaction_suitable(struct zone *zone, int order,
-					       int highest_zoneidx);
+					       int highest_zoneidx,
+					       unsigned int alloc_flags);
extern void compaction_defer_reset(struct zone *zone, int order,
  				bool alloc_success);
@@ -108,7 +109,8 @@ static inline void reset_isolation_suitable(pg_data_t *pgdat)
  }
static inline bool compaction_suitable(struct zone *zone, int order,
-						      int highest_zoneidx)
+						      int highest_zoneidx,
+						      unsigned int alloc_flags)
  {
  	return false;
  }
diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index 07bd227..585f5ab 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -2381,9 +2381,11 @@ static enum compact_result compact_finished(struct compact_control *cc)
static bool __compaction_suitable(struct zone *zone, int order,
  				  int highest_zoneidx,
+				  unsigned int alloc_flags,
  				  unsigned long wmark_target)
  {
  	unsigned long watermark;
+	bool use_cma;
  	/*
  	 * Watermarks for order-0 must be met for compaction to be able to
  	 * isolate free pages for migration targets. This means that the
@@ -2395,25 +2397,27 @@ static bool __compaction_suitable(struct zone *zone, int order,
  	 * even if compaction succeeds.
  	 * For costly orders, we require low watermark instead of min for
  	 * compaction to proceed to increase its chances.
-	 * ALLOC_CMA is used, as pages in CMA pageblocks are considered
-	 * suitable migration targets
+	 * In addition to long term GUP flow, ALLOC_CMA is used, as pages in
+	 * CMA pageblocks are considered suitable migration targets
  	 */
  	watermark = (order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER) ?
  				low_wmark_pages(zone) : min_wmark_pages(zone);
  	watermark += compact_gap(order);
+	use_cma = !!(alloc_flags & ALLOC_CMA);
  	return __zone_watermark_ok(zone, 0, watermark, highest_zoneidx,
-				   ALLOC_CMA, wmark_target);
+				   use_cma ? ALLOC_CMA : 0, wmark_target);

Why not just use 'alloc_flags & ALLOC_CMA' instead? then you can remove the 'use_cma' variable.

  }
/*
   * compaction_suitable: Is this suitable to run compaction on this zone now?
   */
-bool compaction_suitable(struct zone *zone, int order, int highest_zoneidx)
+bool compaction_suitable(struct zone *zone, int order, int highest_zoneidx,
+				   unsigned int alloc_flags)
  {
  	enum compact_result compact_result;
  	bool suitable;
- suitable = __compaction_suitable(zone, order, highest_zoneidx,
+	suitable = __compaction_suitable(zone, order, highest_zoneidx, alloc_flags,
  					 zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES));
  	/*
  	 * fragmentation index determines if allocation failures are due to
@@ -2474,7 +2478,7 @@ bool compaction_zonelist_suitable(struct alloc_context *ac, int order,
  		available = zone_reclaimable_pages(zone) / order;
  		available += zone_page_state_snapshot(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES);
  		if (__compaction_suitable(zone, order, ac->highest_zoneidx,
-					  available))
+					  alloc_flags, available))
  			return true;
  	}
@@ -2499,7 +2503,7 @@ compaction_suit_allocation_order(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order,
  			      alloc_flags))
  		return COMPACT_SUCCESS;
- if (!compaction_suitable(zone, order, highest_zoneidx))
+	if (!compaction_suitable(zone, order, highest_zoneidx, alloc_flags))
  		return COMPACT_SKIPPED;
return COMPACT_CONTINUE;
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index dde19db..9a5dfda 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -2813,6 +2813,7 @@ int __isolate_free_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
  {
  	struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
  	int mt = get_pageblock_migratetype(page);
+	bool pin;
if (!is_migrate_isolate(mt)) {
  		unsigned long watermark;
@@ -2823,7 +2824,8 @@ int __isolate_free_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
  		 * exists.
  		 */
  		watermark = zone->_watermark[WMARK_MIN] + (1UL << order);
-		if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, 0, watermark, 0, ALLOC_CMA))
+		pin = !!(current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC_PIN);
+		if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, 0, watermark, 0, pin ? 0 : ALLOC_CMA))
  			return 0;

I wonder why not pass ‘cc->alloc_flags’ as a parameter for __isolate_free_page()?

  	}
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 5e03a61..33f5b46 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -5815,7 +5815,7 @@ static inline bool should_continue_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
  				      sc->reclaim_idx, 0))
  			return false;
- if (compaction_suitable(zone, sc->order, sc->reclaim_idx))
+		if (compaction_suitable(zone, sc->order, sc->reclaim_idx, ALLOC_CMA))
  			return false;
  	}
@@ -6043,7 +6043,7 @@ static inline bool compaction_ready(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc)
  		return true;
/* Compaction cannot yet proceed. Do reclaim. */
-	if (!compaction_suitable(zone, sc->order, sc->reclaim_idx))
+	if (!compaction_suitable(zone, sc->order, sc->reclaim_idx, ALLOC_CMA))
  		return false;
/*




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux