From: cel@xxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: 15 December 2024 18:58
>
> From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Testing shows that the EBUSY error return from mtree_alloc_cyclic()
> leaks into user space. The ERRORS section of "man creat(2)" says:
>
> > EBUSY O_EXCL was specified in flags and pathname refers
> > to a block device that is in use by the system
> > (e.g., it is mounted).
>
> ENOSPC is closer to what applications expect in this situation.
>
> Note that the normal range of simple directory offset values is
> 2..2^63, so hitting this error is going to be rare to impossible.
>
> Fixes: 6faddda69f62 ("libfs: Add directory operations for stable offsets")
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v6.9+
> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Yang Erkun <yangerkun@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/libfs.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/libfs.c b/fs/libfs.c
> index 748ac5923154..f6d04c69f195 100644
> --- a/fs/libfs.c
> +++ b/fs/libfs.c
> @@ -292,7 +292,9 @@ int simple_offset_add(struct offset_ctx *octx, struct dentry *dentry)
>
> ret = mtree_alloc_cyclic(&octx->mt, &offset, dentry, DIR_OFFSET_MIN,
> LONG_MAX, &octx->next_offset, GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (ret < 0)
> + if (unlikely(ret == -EBUSY))
> + return -ENOSPC;
> + if (unlikely(ret < 0))
> return ret;
You've just added an extra comparison to a hot path.
Doing:
if (ret < 0)
return ret == -EBUSY ? -ENOSPC : ret;
would be better.
David
>
> offset_set(dentry, offset);
> --
> 2.47.0
>
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
