On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 10:32:03AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:21:45AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > So other than the mix up of order parameters I think this should work. > > > > But I'd be wrong, isolated page accounting is not fixed up so it will > eventually hang on too_many_isolated. It turns out it is necessary Good spot. > to pass in zone after all. The following patch passed a high order > allocation stress test. To actually exercise the path I had compaction > call reclaim_clean_pages_from_list() in a separate debugging patch. > > Minchan, can you test your CMA allocation latency test with this patch? > If the figures are satisfactory could you add them to the changelog and > consider replacing the MIGRATE_DISCARD pair of patches with this version > please? Of course, I will do next week. Thanks! -- Kind Regards, Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>