> IOW, I'm looking for a complete, clear (set of) statement(s) that > Ankit can implement to get this (requested) series moving forward, > sooner than later; it's already been a year+ to get to this point, and > I don't want further ambiguity/uncertainty to drag it out more than needed. Yes, I'll be working on this series to get to conclusion. I'll fix the text and split the patch as suggested. Moreover, I'll see what Catalin has to say on the MTE part. Based on that I'll resend the patch series. Thanks Ankit
