I must have missed something, but... On 12/10, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > > @@ -1746,9 +1741,11 @@ static struct mm_struct *dup_mm(struct task_struct *tsk, > if (!mm_init(mm, tsk, mm->user_ns)) > goto fail_nomem; > > + uprobe_start_dup_mmap(); > err = dup_mmap(mm, oldmm); > if (err) > - goto free_pt; > + goto free_pt_end_uprobe; > + uprobe_end_dup_mmap(); > > mm->hiwater_rss = get_mm_rss(mm); > mm->hiwater_vm = mm->total_vm; > @@ -1758,6 +1755,8 @@ static struct mm_struct *dup_mm(struct task_struct *tsk, > > return mm; > > +free_pt_end_uprobe: > + uprobe_end_dup_mmap(); if dup_mmap() fails and "mm" is incomplete, then with this version dup_mmap_sem is dropped before __mmput/exit_mmap/etc. How can this help? Oleg.