On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 11:05:11AM +0800, Michael Wang wrote: > On 09/05/2012 09:55 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Michael Wang wrote: > > > >> Since the cachep and cachep->slabp_cache's l3 alien are in the same lock class, > >> fake report generated. > > > > Ahh... That is a key insight into why this occurs. > > > >> This should not happen since we already have init_lock_keys() which will > >> reassign the lock class for both l3 list and l3 alien. > > > > Right. I was wondering why we still get intermitted reports on this. > > > >> This patch will invoke init_lock_keys() after we done enable_cpucache() > >> instead of before to avoid the fake DEADLOCK report. > > > > Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks for your review. > > And add Paul to the cc list(my skills on mailing is really poor...). Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>