Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] Control folio sizes used for page cache memory

To: Barry Song <21cnbao@xxxxxxxxx>, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] Control folio sizes used for page cache memory
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 13:29:36 +0800
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>, "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>, Lance Yang <ioworker0@xxxxxxxxx>, Gavin Shan <gshan@xxxxxxxxxx>, Pankaj Raghav <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAGsJ_4y=5xvZsWWiZoGh6eqhh+NXCsztyeLVbraUrxR=ruhWzw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20240717071257.4141363-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com> <480f34d0-a943-40da-9c69-2353fe311cf7@arm.com> <CAGsJ_4z8kh4Pn-TUrVq6FALR1J5j4fpvQkef2xPFYPWdWfXdxA@mail.gmail.com> <CAGsJ_4y=5xvZsWWiZoGh6eqhh+NXCsztyeLVbraUrxR=ruhWzw@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird



On 2024/12/6 13:09, Barry Song wrote:

It's unusual that many emails sent days ago are resurfacing on LKML.
Please ignore them.
By the way, does anyone know what happened?

I also received many previous emails, and seems that changing themaillist spam filtering rules by the owner of linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx causedthis.


See: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241205154213.GA5247@xxxxxxxxx/

References:
- [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] Control folio sizes used for page cache memory
  - From: Ryan Roberts
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] Control folio sizes used for page cache memory
  - From: Ryan Roberts
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] Control folio sizes used for page cache memory
  - From: Barry Song
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] Control folio sizes used for page cache memory
  - From: Barry Song